【9月19日】看軍聞學英語
■泰戈爾
原文：
The Romanian MoD stated that Damen’s proposal did not meet the programme’s technical requirements, responding to recent media comparisons with the SAFE acquisition of two MMPV 90 from Rheinmetall. Naval News also outlines the procurement timeline for the Romanian Naval Forces, which shifted from the GOWIND design to OPV 2600, then the Hisar-class OPV, and finally the MMPV 90.
Regarding recent press articles on the subject of the acquisition of military vessels through the SAFE program, versus the Damen Galați offer, the Ministry of National Defence (MApN) makes the following clarifications:
The Damen offer refers to a comparison with products other than those included in SAFE, making the comparison irrelevant. Damen is considering a ship design project, the MOPV 2600, which is not optimized to fully meet the combat missions specified in the operational requirements approved for the SAFE project, especially regarding anti-submarine warfare capabilities.
Also, the articles compare the prices communicated by Damen for the four ships with the estimated value approved for the SAFE projects (the Offshore Patrol Vessel and the Diver Intervention Craft), without taking into account the different level of equipment proposed for each offshore patrol vessel model, in relation to the technical specifications approved by the Navy for SAFE.
中譯：
羅馬尼亞國防部針對近期媒體將該案與透過「SAFE計畫」向萊茵金屬採購2艘 MMPV 90 多用途近海巡邏艦進行對比的報導做出回應，並聲明達門造船廠的提案並未滿足該計畫的技術要求。《海軍新聞》（Naval News）亦概述了羅馬尼亞海軍的採購時程，該時程先前從「追風級」設計轉向 OPV 2600，隨後改為「希薩爾級」巡邏艦，最終選定了 MMPV 90。
針對近期媒體報導關於透過 SAFE 計畫採購軍艦與達門加拉茨（Damen Galați）造船廠報價之對比，羅馬尼亞國防部（MApN）做出以下澄清說明：達門造船廠的報價是與 SAFE 計畫所列項目之外的其他產品進行對比，這使得該比較不具實質意義。達門所提出的艦艇設計方案（MOPV 2600），並未針對 SAFE 計畫已核准之作戰需求中所指定的戰鬥任務進行優化以完全滿足要求，特別是在「反潛戰」能力方面。
此外，相關報導將達門針對4艘艦艇所傳達的價格，與 SAFE 計畫（包含近海巡邏艦與潛水員干預艇）核准的預估價值進行盲目對比，卻未考慮到各型近海巡邏艦針對海軍為 SAFE 計畫所核准的技術規格，在武器裝備配置等級上所存在的本質差異。
-關鍵軍語-
※operational requirements：作戰需求
※anti-submarine warfare：反潛作戰