Eng

Tasers alone will not solve Hong Kong’s social unrest

South China Morning Post
發布於 2020年01月19日16:01 • SCMP Editorial
  • The authorities should carefully consider whether such weapons can produce the desired results, when the true solution lies in a political settlement
More weapons – such as stun guns or tasers – are not the way to resolve Hong Kong’s civil strife; bringing a lasting end to the protests and violence lies in a political solution. Photo: Shutterstock

As Hong Kong's protesters are only too aware, police are well equipped to deal with civil unrest. During eight months of disturbances, they have used pepper spray, tear gas, beanbag rounds, sponge grenades, water cannon, retractable batons and live ammunition. But such means have failed to stop violence and other methods of deterrence are being explored, among them tasers. Given hundreds of people are claimed to have been killed by such weapons and mistrust of officers is rife, caution and thorough investigation should go before haste.

Tasers temporarily paralyse a suspect by delivering a high-voltage shock from the firing of two dart-like electrodes, disrupting voluntary use of muscles. Their ability to deal with potentially violent or dangerous people from a distance has made them popular with police forces, other law enforcement agencies and even militaries around the world.

廣告(請繼續閱讀本文)

Hong Kong police may arm officers with electroshock devices, net guns

The weapon is not considered of much use for crowd control, being able to target only one person at a time. But users perceive it as having great deterrence value, a red laser dot appearing on a suspect's body before a shock is fired being enough in most cases to ensure compliance with an officer's orders.

Effectiveness has to be gauged against the risks, though; after several decades of use, there are more than a thousand documented cases in the United States alone of people dying after being shocked. What role the tasers played is not certain as government agencies do not track how often they are used and the frequency of fatalities and medical examiners have different standards to assess the weapons' role in a death. But it is known that those most vulnerable are young and elderly people, women and those with physical and mental disabilities. Although there is pressure in Britain for all officers to be issued with tasers, in the US some policies are being reviewed and communities are calling for restrictions.

廣告(請繼續閱讀本文)

Tasers require specialised training and strictly enforced rules on use. Their suitability and risks have to be carefully considered. But more weapons are not the way to resolve Hong Kong's civil strife; bringing a lasting end to the protests and violence lies in a political solution.

Copyright (c) 2020. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.

查看原始文章
留言 4
  • Steven
    Lest, put the fear of god on them😆
    2020年01月20日00:05
  • StupidMeow
    幾十蚊可以解決嘅問題又買呢d又搞個d? 一粒子彈幾錢呀? 你射番一千幾百粒先一支電槍嘅價錢... 講真曱甴死番十個八個冇人可憐,由其係有攻擊性嘅勇武 射哂d勇武未得番d和理非和平示威
    2020年01月20日01:43
  • Steven
    Jap, you better to begone as dwarf Jap has no place to interference. By the way, I don’t see in what way and in any event Jap truly celebrating democracy. A sovereignty bearing alien troops is sinfully disgrace and Jap take prides of it👏👏👏😄😄 Finished your mastermind before you Jap starting jabbing 😁.
    2020年01月20日01:03
  • Alan
    共狗獨裁暴政下,香港淪陷二十年,黑警淪爲共畜走狗,無法無天,非法使用武器,攻擊市民,人神共憤!向學生實彈射擊,無差別攻擊平民,地鐵站民居使用毒氣,地鐵車廂攻擊市民,攻擊記者,攻擊議員,攻擊救護,阻礙人道救援,阻礙接觸律師,闖入私人物業無差別打人,濫捕濫權,滅絶人性,超越人類道德文明底線!犯下嚴重人道罪行,香港人要向國際法庭、各國使領館、聯合國指證黑警暴行,追究到底,繩之於法,一隻警畜都不能放過
    2020年01月20日02:11
顯示全部