請更新您的瀏覽器

您使用的瀏覽器版本較舊,已不再受支援。建議您更新瀏覽器版本,以獲得最佳使用體驗。

Eng

Spotlight: Boeing keeps FAA in dark in key design changes to 737 MAX, says U.S. government report

XINHUA

發布於 2020年07月02日03:42

Rescuers work beside the wreckage of an Ethiopian Airlines' aircraft at the crash site, some 50 km east of Addis Ababa, capital of Ethiopia, on March 10, 2019. The incident, which involved a Boeing 737-800 MAX, occurred a few minutes after the aircraft took off from Addis Ababa Bole International Airport to Nairobi, Kenya. (Xinhua/Wang Shoubao)

Boeing modified the MAX's flight control software, known as the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) as a result of flight testing, including significantly increasing MCAS's ability to lower the aircraft's nose automatically under certain conditions throughout 2015 and 2016. However, Boeing did not submit certification documents to the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) detailing the change.

WASHINGTON, July 1 (Xinhua) -- Boeing fell short of disclosing changes to a key flight control system, which faulted in two fatal crashes, to the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), thus the FAA was not well positioned to mitigate any risks, according to a government report made public on Wednesday.

The report, from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Office of Inspector General, revealed mistakes made by both the planemaker and the FAA in the development and certification of Boeing's top-selling aircraft 737 MAX.

The FAA followed its established certification process for the 737 MAX 8, which began in early 2012 when Boeing submitted its initial application for an amended type certificate (ATC).

United States' National Transportation Safety Board and Indonesia's National Transportation Safety Committee officials check the debris of the crashed Lion Air JT 610 during their investigation of the air plane crash at The Tanjung Priok port, Jakarta, Indonesia, Nov. 1, 2018. (Xinhua/Veri Sanovri)

Early in the process, Boeing included limited information in initial briefings to the FAA on the MAX's flight control software, known as the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), which subsequently has been cited as a contributing or potentially contributing factor in both accidents, said the report dated June 29.

The MCAS was not an area of emphasis in FAA's certification efforts and therefore did not receive a more detailed review or discussion between FAA engineers and Boeing, according to the report.

"As a result, FAA was not well positioned to mitigate any risks related to MCAS," said the report.

People hold photos of Boeing 737 plane crash victims as Stephen Dickson, chief of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), testifies before the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure during a hearing on "The Boeing 737 MAX: Examining the Federal Aviation Administration's Oversight of the Aircraft's Certification" in Washington D.C., the United States, on Dec. 11, 2019. (Photo by Sarah Silbiger/Xinhua)

From 2012 to 2014, Boeing and the FAA collaborated to develop and implement an overall certification plan, including determining which aspects of the certification process would be delegated to the Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) of Boeing.

Boeing modified the MCAS as a result of flight testing, including significantly increasing MCAS's ability to lower the aircraft's nose automatically under certain conditions throughout 2015 and 2016. However, Boeing did not submit certification documents to the FAA detailing the change, according to the report.

In March 2017, the FAA issued an ATC to Boeing for the 737 MAX 8, which began flying passengers later that year.

The FAA is in charge of overseeing the safety and certification of all civilian aircraft manufactured and operated in the United States.

Tarek Milleron (L), uncle of 24-year-old Samya Stumo who was killed on the Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302, protests outside the James Simpson Theatre in the Field Museum of Natural History, where Boeing holds its annual shareholders meeting, in Chicago, the United States, on April 29, 2019. (Xinhua/Joel Lerner)

"The tragic accidents in 2018 and 2019 involving the Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft have raised important questions about FAA's certification process, including its oversight of the ODA program," said the report.

The accidents, including FAA's response following the Lion Air crash, have also drawn attention to the agency's processes for determining certification basis, assessing pilot training needs, and conducting risk analyses, said the report.

On Oct. 29, 2018, Indonesia's Lion Air Flight 610 crashed, resulting in 189 fatalities. The 737 Max 8 plane was bound for Pangkal Pinang, an island chain off Sumatra.

On March 10, 2019, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashed shortly after departing Addis Ababa Bole International Airport, a second crash involving a 737 MAX, killing 157 people on board.  ■

0 0
reaction icon 0
reaction icon 0
reaction icon 0
reaction icon 0
reaction icon 0
reaction icon 0